Template:— representing_work_request (rep_wrk_req) Date: 2008/02/21 16:29:46
Revision: 1.22
CoverContentsDescriptionModel diags.Input params.Ref. params.Instantiation pathInstance diags.CharacterizationsIssues

Issue raised against: representing_work_request

GENERAL issues

Closed issue Issue: RBN-1 by Rob Bodington (07-01-02) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

A number of the input parameters should be defined types, not integers. The input parameters that are enumerations should have the enumeration specified.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-01-02)
Corrected.

Closed issue Issue: RBN-2 by Rob Bodington (07-03-27) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Following populations are missing in template path: ^work_req.description = '/IGNORE' ^work_req.purpose = '/IGNORE' ^work_req.request_id = '/IGNORE' ^work_req.version_id = '/IGNORE'
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-03-27)
Corrected

Closed issue Issue: RBN-3 by Rob Bodington (07-11-18) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

The parameter: version_id_class_name (Type='CLASS') has classifications: "Identifier_type" It should be: Version_identification_code
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
Corrected

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-33 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 6 XML >figure ..< tags do not include a "master"-attribute with a reference to an editable file (source file).
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
Added

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-34 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 7 Not all editable files supporting the Template are stored in the "dvlp" folder: not template.xml and not the figure sources.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
Added

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-35 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 8 There is not an editable (source) file (under 'dvlp') of the same name as each figure file provided (under 'images').
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
Added

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-36 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 14 Reference data classes are not referred by: >rdl_ref = " " urn = " " /<
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
They are

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-37 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 15 There are references to Stepmod modules: links in Reference Parameters point into stepmod modules, e.g., "Allow the >Work_request< entity ..." ; same in Instantiation Path.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
Agree

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-38 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 28 The EXPRESS-G diagram contains templates that are additional characterization * which I think is good.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
Unfortunately the agreement is that the main diagram should NOT have any characterizations. I have moved them to the characterization diagram

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-39 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 29 version_id_class_name and version_id_ecl_id are * e.g. (there may be more) - missing as blue text in the diagram. version_org_id_ecl_id in the text is called version_id_org_ecl_id in the diagram.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
Corrected

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-39a by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 32 Assigning_descriptor is * according to the characterization section * mandatory, but drawn with a dashed line.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
No longer mandatory

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-40 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 42 The abbreviated graphical template representation is missing. Also missing is the mandatory assigning_descriptor template.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
Corrected

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-41 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 46 "representing" is not in the abbreviated name at all.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
Corrected - now rep_wrk_req

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-42 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 47 An arrow with the name "affected_items" exits the representing_work_request box; this does not seem right.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
Corrected

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-43 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 49 The box contains 20 parameters, but 27 are listed below; the version stuff seems to be missing ... .
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
Corrected

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-44 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 51 "The id of the External_class_library that stores the class." should be completed with the name of the class.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
Corrected

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-45 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 52 There is "state_ecl_id (Default='urn:plcs:rdl:std',Type='URN')", whereas other ..._ecl_id are typed as "(Type='URN')". "Sense" got the type ENUMERATION, which is not in the list of valid types!
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
ENUMERATION is valid Defaults for ecl_ids provided

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-46 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 53 For purpose the classification is: "PLCS-ARM-LF-ENTITY" incl. all sub-classes. This does not look right.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
Changed to work_request_purpose

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-47 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 61 The optional templates in the Express-G are not in the instantiation path.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
Nor should they be

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-48 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 69 Some individual instances are displayed; these should probably be replaced by templates.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-49 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 71 Assigning_descriptor is shown although being an additional characterization (but it is mandatory and useful!).
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
It is now optional- but still shown

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-50 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 73 Reference data used to provide a meaningful example have other URN but 'urn:plcs:rdl:sample' .
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
The urn are correct urn:plcs:rdl:std is used where appropriate

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-51 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 74 Not all of the templates are filled yellow.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-17)
Corrected

Closed issue Issue: EPM-RI-52 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\\EPM reviews\template_issues_EPMT_JH.xls Template: representing_work_request Check list clause: 88 No uniqueness constraint given though a kind of primary key rule would be useful.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-21)
Added