Template:— representing_dated_effectivity (rep_date_eff) | Date: 2008/02/26 17:20:57 Revision: 1.16 |
Comment: (Rob Bodington 2007-01-02)
Corrected.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Added as an issue against capability to add new template to use when start date is unknown.
Comment: (Mike Ward 2008-09-17)
This issue reopened. The UK_Defence project needs to use this template. The start date of a dated effectvity needs to be optional and the porposal to use a dummy date is unsatisfactory. A SEDs has been raised against the AP239 EXPRESS schema proposing that Dated_effectvity.start_bound be made optional.
Comment: (Ann Meads 2010-01-22)
This issue is deferred until ed2 of PLCS. This change to the current ed1 AP239 EXPRESS schema is unacceptable since there are a number of implementations built against the current schema.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
No master files available. More cost-efficient to remodel when needed, ref. Leif Gyllstrom..
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
No master files available. More cost-efficient to remodel when needed, ref. Leif Gyllstrom.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Fixed.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Points to the consolidated Figure 5 as it should.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Major issue against capability not affecting this template.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Major issue against capability not affecting this template.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Removed.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Fixed.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Fixed.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Enumeration is an accepted type.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Removed from diagram.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Fixed.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Not applicable. Semantics not the same to have 2 different Dated_effectivity with same input parameters as 1 unique Dated_effectivity.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Fixed.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Fixed.