Template:— representing_count (rep_count) Date: 2008/01/17 10:56:33
Revision: 1.24
CoverContentsDescriptionModel diags.Input params.Ref. params.Instantiation pathInstance diags.CharacterizationsIssues

Issue raised against: representing_count

OTHER issues

Closed issue Issue: TJT-1 by Tim Turner (14-02-2007) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

in representing_count the instantiation path is incorrect. The si_unit refered to below must be of type boolean not string -- Set the Unit attributes Unit.si_unit = 'false' Unit.name = '/IGNORE' i.e. either; Unit.si_unit = .F. regards, Tim NB Maybe you could also check your other templates that make use of si_units and correct where necessary?
Comment: (Peter Bergström 2007-02-16)
The si_unit attribute is actually not defined in this template, but in template representing_value_with_unit. I see no reason for any changes here.

Closed issue Issue: TJT-2 by Tim Turner (14-02-2007) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

in representing_count the instantiation path is incorrect. The resulting instances of this template include; #6 = UNIT('/IGNORE', 'false'); #5 = VALUE_WITH_UNIT(#6, 1.); However, the type of unit is missing. Given the select type options of any_number_value, any_string_value, plane_angle_measure or length_measure, one of these should be populated in the template to produce a valid instantiation. For example, #6 = UNIT('/IGNORE',.F.); #5 = VALUE_WITH_UNIT(#6,ANY_NUMBER_VALUE(1.)); regards, Tim NB Maybe you could also check your other templates that make use of si_units and correct where necessary?
Comment: (Peter Bergström 2007-02-16)
This have now been corrected. The datatype must be given as part of the value. A default value of "any_number_value(1)" has also been defined.

Closed issue Issue: TJT-3 by Tim Turner (14-02-2007) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

in representing_count the templates figure 3 is misleading - there is no indication of the representation or need for the type of unit to be used. If one is not to be specified, then it needs to be part of the instantiation path. regards, Tim NB Maybe you could also check your other templates that make use of si_units and correct where necessary?
Comment: (Peter Bergström 2007-02-16)
Figure 3 and 4 has been edited to show the datatype.

Closed issue Issue: TRO-1 by Trisha Rollo (2007-06-15) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Master file for figures does not match name that of the image files
Comment: (Mike Ward 2008-01-17)
Figures all redrawn and master file references updated.

Closed issue Issue: TRO-2 by Trisha Rollo (2007-06-25) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

short name does not conform to template checklist of valid values
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 2007-06-25)
amended

Closed issue Issue: RBN-1 by Rob Bodington (07-08-09) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

There should be a uniqueness constraint against Unit
Comment: (Mike Ward 2008-01-17)
Uniqueness constraint created against Unit.

Closed issue Issue: GYL-1 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-11) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue. Review items 7 and 8 : Several editable files are missing.
Comment: (Mike Ward 2008-01-17)
All diagrams redrawn and master files committed.

Closed issue Issue: GYL-2 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-11) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue. Review item 13 : Instance diagrams under the Instance diagrams section are hard to read. Enlarge.
Comment: (Mike Ward 2008-01-17)
All diagrams redrawn and master files committed.

Closed issue Issue: GYL-3 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-11) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue. Review item 62 : An Entity is assigned to the input parameter ‘items’ of the template assigning_reference_data. Entity is not in the list of allowed assignments.
Comment: (Mike Ward 2008-01-17)
The assignment is correct.

Closed issue Issue: GYL-4 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-11) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue. Review item 82 : Value of input parameter ‘value’ is not consistent with the textual example.
Comment: (Mike Ward 2008-01-17)
Values now consistent.

Closed issue Issue: GYL-5 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-11) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue. Review item 88 : See open issue RBN-1
Comment: (Mike Ward 2008-01-17)
All issues now addressed.