| Template:— assigning_reference_data (asg_rd) | Date: 2009/06/10 09:22:49  Revision: 1.30  | 
         
               Issue:
               PBM-1 by Peter Bergström (2007-01-31) minor_technical issue In order to process OWL correctly, the reference data library that is the most specialized rdl must be identified as the context ontology. The context ontology must include all other rdl's in an exchange file. This should be achieved by classifying the most specialized External_data_library as the "Context_ontology".

This template should describe how to achieve this, both in text and using an instance example. An OWL class "Context_ontology" has to be created. Possibly, a specific template has to be developed for this.
Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 07-04-23)
This issue has been moved to the template 'representing_message', since the context ontology should only be refered to once within a message.
               Issue:
               RBN-1 by Rob Bodington (07-04-03) minor_technical issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-04-03)
Implemented rule
               Issue:
               RBN-2 by Rob Bodington (07-04-13) minor_technical issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 07-04-03)
Added a note within the description section.
               Issue:
               PBM-2 by Peter Bergström (2007-05-04) minor_technical issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
Accepted and set description attribute to '/IGNORE'. Updated figure 1, figure 3 and Instantiation path accordingly.
               Issue:
               PBM-3 by Peter Bergström (2007-05-04) minor_technical issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 07-05-04)
Agree. Added reference parameter ext_class_lib and defined a corresponding uniqueness rule.
               Issue:
               TJT-1 by Tim Turner, LSC (04/09/2007) minor_technical issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
Rejected. Can not reproduce the referenced error.
               Issue:
               DNV-67 by Fredrik Lied Larsen, DNV (2007-7-25) minor_technical issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
Rejected. All four figures under the image folder are used in the template.
               Issue:
               DNV-68 by Fredrik Lied Larsen, DNV (2007-7-25) minor_technical issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
Rejected. There are editable files available with the right names.
               Issue:
               DNV-69 by Fredrik Lied Larsen, DNV (2007-7-25) editorial issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
Accepted and corrected.
               Issue:
               DNV-70 by Fredrik Lied Larsen, DNV (2007-7-25) minor_technical issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
Rejected. Can not reproduce the referenced error using Oxygen XML editor. According to Oxygen is the >instance_diagram_example a valid element wherer it is.
               Issue:
               DNV-71 by Fredrik Lied Larsen, DNV (2007-8-14) minor_technical issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
Rejected. Figure numbers are automatic if not stated otherwise.
               Issue:
               DNV-72 by Fredrik Lied Larsen, DNV (2007-7-25) minor_technical issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
Rejected. The intension of this review item was that modules in stepmod shouldn't be referenced explicitly. However, Entities needs to be referenced! Issue to be raised against template checklist.
               Issue:
               DNV-73 by Fredrik Lied Larsen, DNV (2007-8-14) minor_technical issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
Rejected. No references are made within the text that needs to be hyperlinked.
               Issue:
               DNV-74 by Fredrik Lied Larsen, DNV (2007-8-14) minor_technical issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
Rejected. Organization is valid reviewer.
               Issue:
               DNV-75 by Fredrik Lied Larsen, DNV (2007-8-14) minor_technical issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
Rejected. Intension of checklist was that status should have passed the stage of 'end_modelling'
               Issue:
               DNV-76 by Fredrik Lied Larsen, DNV (2007-8-14) minor_technical issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
Rejected. PLCS-ARM-LF_ENTITY is a valid class in the RDL. However, this is the only place where this class is being referenced since any subclass of PLCS-ARM-LF_ENTITY is valid. Alternative would be to state every subclass of PLCS-ARM-LF_ENTITY, which wouldn't be meaningful.
               Issue:
               DNV-77 by Fredrik Lied Larsen, DNV (2007-7-25) minor_technical issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
See issue PBM-2.
               Issue:
               LOGSA-RI-1 by , LOGSA (2007-10-25) minor_technical issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
See issue DNV-71
               Issue:
               LOGSA-RI-2 by , LOGSA (2007-10-25) editorial issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
See issue DNV-74
               Issue:
               LOGSA-RI-3 by , LOGSA (2007-10-25) editorial issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
Rejected. The purpose is only stated as a description of the template. Raised an issue against the checklist.
               Issue:
               LOGSA-RI-4 by , LOGSA (2007-10-25) minor_technical issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
Rejected. No reference data is being used in the reference path.
               Issue:
               LOGSA-RI-5 by , LOGSA (2007-10-25) minor_technical issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
Rejected. Entities do, but Templates have blue.
               Issue:
               LOGSA-RI-5 by , LOGSA (2007-10-25) editorial issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 08-01-21)
Rejected. Error in checklist !
               Issue:
               RBN-3 by Rob Bodington (08-02-11) minor_technical issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-02-12)
Added constraint
               Issue:
               RBN-4 by Rob Bodington (08-02-28) minor_technical issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-02-28)
Changed
               Issue:
               RBN-5 by Rob Bodington (08-06-18) major_technical issue Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 2009-06-10)
Added notes to the description section of the template that defines how the use of this template will be superseded in DEXlib edition 2. These notes reflects the agreements being made during the ballot resolution process.