Template:— representing_view_definition_usage (rep_view_usage) Date: 2008/03/05 16:17:55
Revision: 1.4
CoverContentsDescriptionModel diags.Input params.Ref. params.Instantiation pathInstance diags.CharacterizationsIssues

Issue raised against: representing_view_definition_usage

GENERAL issues

Closed issue Issue: DNV-1 by Fredrik Lied Larsen, DNV (2008-3-5) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: C:\DEXlib\issues\template_issues.xls Template: representing_view_definition_usage Check list clause: 14 There is no reference to entity product_view_definition in the Description section. Description of input parameters relating_product and related_product is also missing reference to entity.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-05)
Fixed.

Closed issue Issue: DNV-2 by Fredrik Lied Larsen, DNV (2008-3-5) major_technical issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Issue file: C:\DEXlib\issues\template_issues.xls Template: representing_view_definition_usage Check list clause: 17 Template representing_breakdown_element_realization is exactly the same template. Error might be with template rep_bkdn_elem_real.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-05)
Representing_breakdown_element_realization is a specialization of this template putting constraints on classification of View_definition_usage and on input parameters, i.e. classification and input parameters are different.

Closed issue Issue: DNV-3 by Fredrik Lied Larsen, DNV (2008-3-5) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: C:\DEXlib\issues\template_issues.xls Template: representing_view_definition_usage Check list clause: 48 Reference parameters are not shown for the graphical presentation of the template.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-05)
Fixed.

Closed issue Issue: DNV-4 by Fredrik Lied Larsen, DNV (2008-3-5) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: C:\DEXlib\issues\template_issues.xls Template: representing_view_definition_usage Check list clause: 50 Spelling mistake in EXPRESS-G diagram for input parameter related_product, written "relatedproduct"
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-05)
Fixed.

Closed issue Issue: DNV-5 by Fredrik Lied Larsen, DNV (2008-3-5) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: C:\DEXlib\issues\template_issues.xls Template: representing_view_definition_usage Check list clause: 51 The description for relating_product and related_product is not understandable.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-05)
Fixed.

Closed issue Issue: DNV-6 by Fredrik Lied Larsen, DNV (2008-3-5) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: C:\DEXlib\issues\template_issues.xls Template: representing_view_definition_usage Check list clause: 73 The reference data used for the example is not valid for this template. Breakdown_element_realization is an entity and it is not a sub class of view_definition_usage.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-05)
Fixed.

Closed issue Issue: DNV-7 by Fredrik Lied Larsen, DNV (2008-3-5) major_technical issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Issue file: C:\DEXlib\issues\template_issues.xls Template: representing_view_definition_usage Check list clause: 88 There is no uniqueness constraint for the template.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-05)
Not applicable, e.g. consider the case when effectivity is used to control the usage between same relating and related view definition in two or more different occasions.