Template:— representing_independent_property (rep_indpt_prp) Date: 2008/03/07 23:26:57
Revision: 1.7

Issue raised against: representing_independent_property

GENERAL issues


Closed issue Issue: DNV-35 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-12-3) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: representing_independent_property Check list clause: 6 master referring to __inst_tmpl.giz contains two underscores
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Fixed.


Closed issue Issue: DNV-36 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-12-3) editorial issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: representing_independent_property Check list clause: 9 XML does not contain the same text as HTML, but XML is spell checked OK.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Not an issue.


Closed issue Issue: DNV-37 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-12-3) editorial issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: representing_independent_property Check list clause: 14 No instances of >rdl_ref in XML
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
No reference needed.


Closed issue Issue: DNV-38 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-12-3) editorial issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: representing_independent_property Check list clause: 16 No instances of >figure_ref i XML!
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
No reference needed.


Closed issue Issue: DNV-39 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-12-3) major_technical issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: representing_independent_property Check list clause: 17 Why is it necessary to have multiple mechanisms for representing properties? There are different mechanisms for process properties, product properties and resource properties. This is highly confusing and should be avoided
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Not a template issue.


Closed issue Issue: DNV-40 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-12-3) major_technical issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: representing_independent_property Check list clause: 18 There is difficult to understand how and when the template should be used. When will you ever want to use a property without any context?
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Not a template issue.


Closed issue Issue: DNV-41 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-12-3) major_technical issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: representing_independent_property Check list clause: 24 See 17 and 18. There is no purpose clause. Why is this functionality needed? Add explanation of usage and rationale for when it is useful.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Usage is clear within the scope of the capability representing_independent_property.


Closed issue Issue: DNV-42 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-12-3) editorial issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: representing_independent_property Check list clause: 51 Rewrite descriptions. How does the class name correspond to the property name (isn't it the same as the property name?). Why do you need to identify the entity type External_class_library. Is it necessary to open up the asg_rd to explain the parameter?
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Basic AP239/DEXlib/RDL functionality.


Closed issue Issue: DNV-43 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-12-3) major_technical issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: representing_independent_property Check list clause: 65 plcs_registered.owl file does not contain any data.
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Other OWL-file is used, ref. Rob Bodington.


Closed issue Issue: DNV-44 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-12-3) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: representing_independent_property Check list clause: 87 P28 example is empty
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Removed p28 example.


Closed issue Issue: DNV-45 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-12-3) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: representing_independent_property Check list clause: 88 Uniqueness is missing. Should be added. Can there be more than one independent property with the same property name?
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Fixed.


Closed issue Issue: DNV-46 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-12-3) major_technical issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: representing_independent_property Check list clause: 52b property_ecl_id should be optional and have default set to "urn:plcs_rdl_std".
Comment: (Johan Nielsen 2008-02-26)
Default is urn:plcs:rdl:std and must be mandatory.


Closed issue Issue: RBN-1 by Rob Bodington (08-03-06) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

The param_in "property_class_name" should have "Activity_property" as the permissible classifications.
Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 2008-03-07)
Changed it to include both "Activity_property", "Assigned_property" and "Resource_property". All three are valid, dependent upon the context where the Independent_property is being used.