Template:— process_property_numeric (proc_prp_num) Date: 2008/02/28 10:30:55
Revision: 1.22
CoverContentsDescriptionModel diags.Input params.Ref. params.Instantiation pathInstance diags.CharacterizationsIssues

Issue raised against: process_property_numeric

GENERAL issues

Closed issue Issue: PBM-1 by Peter Bergström (2007-02-16) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

The necessity of chosing a datatype for the input parameter 'value' is not made clear in the parameter definition. It appears that value can be "5" or similar, when in fact the datatype must be given as well, e.g. "ANY_NUMBER_VALUE(5)".
Comment: (Peter Bergström 2007-02-16)
Fixed by editing the parameter description. I also harmonized the description of parameter si_unit with other templates.

Closed issue Issue: SMB-1 by Sean Barker (2007-03-20) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Figure 1 shows that Activity_property_representation can be referenced as ^prop_repr, however this is missing from the templates in figure 2. Please Fix.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-03-20)
Corrected

Closed issue Issue: BNN-1 by Bill Nairn (2007-06-26) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Changes made: Updated model review status; corrected .png file names (where needed); identified source files for each .png file; removed optional temlates from Figure 1; Created charaterizations summary diagram (Figure 6).
Comment: ( )

Closed issue Issue: GYL-1 by Leif Gyllstrom (07-12-09) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue, review item 14: References within the characterization section does not comply with this rule. E.g. characterization assigning person or organization where person and organization is stated without hyperlinks to the respective entity.
Comment: (Mike Ward 2008-01-17)
All entity names (cf names of real world objects) are hyperlinked.

Closed issue Issue: GYL-2 by Leif Gyllstrom (07-12-09) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue, review item 30: No explicit relation between input attributes and constructs in the diagram (e.g. by arrows).
Comment: (Mike Ward 2008-01-21)
Addressed.

Closed issue Issue: GYL-3 by Leif Gyllstrom (07-12-09) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue, review item 48: Reference parameter ‘proc_prop’ shall be changed to ‘prop_repr’
Comment: (Mike Ward 2008-01-17)
Reference parameter is now "prop_repr".

Closed issue Issue: GYL-4 by Leif Gyllstrom (07-12-09) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue, review item 51: Input parameter 'si_unit'. Do we need to bring in explanations on Part 21 and Part 28 representations ?
Comment: (Mike Ward 2008-01-17)
A note about ths issue has been included.

Closed issue Issue: GYL-5 by Leif Gyllstrom (07-12-09) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue, review item 51: Input parameter 'context'. Should we be able to reuse representation contexts that are being defined as subclasses of the class ‘Representation_context’ ?
Comment: (Mike Ward 2008-01-21)
Changed to Representation_context as per "Notes from issue resolution teleocn 2007-17-12"

Closed issue Issue: GYL-6 by Leif Gyllstrom (07-12-09) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue, review item 59: “-- Bind the Activity_property_ representation entity to reference parameter ^prop_repr” is repeated twice in the path.
Comment: (Mike Ward 2008-01-17)
Duplicate binding removed.

Closed issue Issue: GYL-7 by Leif Gyllstrom (07-12-09) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue, review item 72: Value of limit shall contain ‘any_value_number()’
Comment: (Mike Ward 2008-01-21)
Corrected.

Closed issue Issue: GYL-8 by Leif Gyllstrom (07-12-09) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue, review item 82: Value of limit shall contain ‘any_value_number()’
Comment: (Mike Ward 2008-01-17)
Value input parameter corrected..

Closed issue Issue: GYL-9 by Leif Gyllstrom (07-12-09) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue, review item 90: Figures within the characterization section should use the template representation for process_property_ numeric, and not the ExpressG diagrams.
Comment: (Mike Ward 2008-01-17)
This is not a checklist requirement. No chracterizations should be shown in the main EXPRESS-G diagram, but characterization diagrams may be based either on the consolidated templated diagram or on the expanded EXPRESS-G diagram..