Behavioural Atom Protocol Version 1.0
Committee Specification Draft 01
03 December 2015
Specification URIs
This version:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/coel/BAP/v1.0/csd01/BAP-v1.0-csd01.docx (Authoritative)
http://docs.oasis-open.org/coel/BAP/v1.0/csd01/BAP-v1.0-csd01.html
http://docs.oasis-open.org/coel/BAP/v1.0/csd01/BAP-v1.0-csd01.pdf
Previous version:
N/A
Latest version:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/coel/BAP/v1.0/BAP-v1.0.docx (Authoritative)
http://docs.oasis-open.org/coel/BAP/v1.0/BAP-v1.0.html
http://docs.oasis-open.org/coel/BAP/v1.0/BAP-v1.0.pdf
Technical Committee:
OASIS Classification of Everyday Living (COEL) TC
Chairs:
David Snelling (David.Snelling@UK.Fujitsu.com), Fujitsu Limited
Joss Langford (joss@activinsights.co.uk), Activinsights Ltd
Editor:
Joss Langford (joss@activinsights.co.uk), Activinsights Ltd
Related work:
This specification is related to:
Abstract:
This document defines a protocol for data exchanges that are capable of describing, querying and reporting a human activity event (Behavioural Atom) using the COEL model classification, as well as the context in which it took place (e.g. time, location).
Status:
This document was last revised or approved by the OASIS Classification of Everyday Living (COEL) TC on the above date. The level of approval is also listed above. Check the “Latest version” location noted above for possible later revisions of this document. Any other numbered Versions and other technical work produced by the Technical Committee (TC) are listed at https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=coel#technical.
TC members should send comments on this specification to the TC’s email list. Others should send comments to the TC’s public comment list, after subscribing to it by following the instructions at the “Send A Comment button on the TC’s web page at https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/coel/.
For information on whether any patents have been disclosed that may be essential to implementing this specification, and any offers of patent licensing terms, please refer to the Intellectual Property Rights section of the TC’s web page (https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/coel/ipr.php).
Citation format:
When referencing this specification the following citation format should be used:
[COEL-BAP-v1.0]
Behavioural Atom Protocol Version 1.0. Edited by Joss Langford. 03 December 2015. OASIS Committee Specification Draft 01. http://docs.oasis-open.org/coel/BAP/v1.0/csd01/BAP-v1.0-csd01.pdf. Latest version: http://docs.oasis-open.org/coel/BAP/v1.0/BAP-v1.0.html.
Notices
Copyright © OASIS Open 2015. All Rights Reserved.
All capitalized terms in the following text have the meanings assigned to them in the OASIS Intellectual Property Rights Policy (the "OASIS IPR Policy"). The full Policy may be found at the OASIS website.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published, and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this section are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, including by removing the copyright notice or references to OASIS, except as needed for the purpose of developing any document or deliverable produced by an OASIS Technical Committee (in which case the rules applicable to copyrights, as set forth in the OASIS IPR Policy, must be followed) or as required to translate it into languages other than English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by OASIS or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and OASIS DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY OWNERSHIP RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
OASIS requests that any OASIS Party or any other party that believes it has patent claims that would necessarily be infringed by implementations of this OASIS Committee Specification or OASIS Standard, to notify OASIS TC Administrator and provide an indication of its willingness to grant patent licenses to such patent claims in a manner consistent with the IPR Mode of the OASIS Technical Committee that produced this specification.
OASIS invites any party to contact the OASIS TC Administrator if it is aware of a claim of ownership of any patent claims that would necessarily be infringed by implementations of this specification by a patent holder that is not willing to provide a license to such patent claims in a manner consistent with the IPR Mode of the OASIS Technical Committee that produced this specification. OASIS may include such claims on its website, but disclaims any obligation to do so.
OASIS takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on OASIS' procedures with respect to rights in any document or deliverable produced by an OASIS Technical Committee can be found on the OASIS website. Copies of claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this OASIS Committee Specification or OASIS Standard, can be obtained from the OASIS TC Administrator. OASIS makes no representation that any information or list of intellectual property rights will at any time be complete, or that any claims in such list are, in fact, Essential Claims.
The name "OASIS" is a trademark of OASIS, the owner and developer of this specification, and should be used only to refer to the organization and its official outputs. OASIS welcomes reference to, and implementation and use of, specifications, while reserving the right to enforce its marks against misleading uses. Please see https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/trademark for above guidance.
Table of Contents
2.2.1 Data Engine Information Request
3 Atom Object Definition (JSON)
Behavioural Atoms represent distinct human behavioural events. Their granularity has been designed so that they are small in terms of data volume but detailed enough to capture a single human behavior (e.g. eating egg based noodles or swimming laps of butterfly). The format of the Behavioural Atom allows many aspects of a human activity event to be coded – the type of event, the individual that the event relates to, the time it occurred, how it was recorded, location and context. The coding for the type of event references the hierarchical taxonomy defined in the Classification of Everyday Living [COEL_COEL-1.0].
This document describes the Behavioural Atom format and protocol for transmitting Atoms in this format to a Data Engine.
The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels”, BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt.
[RFC2616] R. Fielding et al, Hypertext Transfer Protocol – HTTP/1.1, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt.
[RFC3986] T.Berners-Lee et al, Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax, August 1998, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt.
[RFC4627] D. Crockford, The application/json Media Type for JavaScript Object Notation (JSON), July 2006, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt.
[RFC5246] T. Dierks and E. Rescorla, The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5246.txt.
[COEL_RPE-1.0] Roles, Principles, and Ecosystem Version 1.0. Latest version: http://docs.oasis-open.org/coel/RPE/v1.0/RPE-v1.0.docx
[COEL_IDA-1.0] Identity Authority Interface Version 1.0. Latest version: http://docs.oasis-open.org/coel/IDA/v1.0/IDA-v1.0.docx
[COEL_COEL-1.0] Classification of Everyday Living Version 1.0. Latest version: http://docs.oasis-open.org/coel/COEL/v1.0/COEL-v1.0.docx
[Weather] OpenWeatherMap, Weather Condition Codes. Latest version: http://openweathermap.org/weather-conditions.
[Data to Life] Reed, M. & Langford, J. (2013). Data to Life. Coelition, London. ISBN 978-0957609402
All interfaces are designed around the HTTP protocol stack [HTTP] and in particular rely on the REST based operational model. Each message includes one of the HTTP verbs, in particular GET or POST only, and further information depending on the operation being performed. This later information is included in the message body and encoded in JSON format [JSON].
In line with REST style protocol conventions, all accessible entities in the system SHALL be identifiable and reachable through dereferencing a URL unique to that entity. Entry to the system as a whole is via a well-known initial URI, known as the Data Engine Home URI.
If the media type is present in the message, it SHALL be “application/json”. Atom server implementations SHALL accept message with this media type or none. However, they MAY reject malformed or oversized messages.
Only two operations are supported by the Behavioural Atom Protocol. The first is a GET operation directed at the Data Engine Home URI, which returns general information about the Data Engine and in particular the URI of the Atom POST operation URI.
Every Data Engine SHALL publish its Data Engine Home URI. Performing a GET on this URI SHALL return general information about the Data Engine as JSON object. The fields returned SHALL include the “atomsURI”, the “queryURI”, and the “managementURI” encoded as strings.
Method |
Request |
Response Status |
Response Content-Type |
Response Body |
GET |
None |
200 (OK) |
application/json |
JSON object |
GET |
Any |
415 (Unsupported Media Type) |
None |
None |
POST |
Any |
405 (Method Not Allowed) |
None |
None |
The JSON object of the response MAY contain additional fields with information about the Data Engine. The fields returned MUST include the “atomsURI”, the “queryURI”, and the “managementURI”; these are the target URLs to be used for adding Atoms, querying Atoms and managing access to the data engine.
Example request message:
GET /home
Example response message:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
{“atomsURI”: “https://www.dataengine.com/atoms”,
“queryURI”: “https://www.dataengine.com/query”,
“managementURI”: “https://www.dataengine.com/management”}
To add a Behavioural Atom to the Data Engine, a POST operation SHALL be sent to the Atom POST URI obtained by a preceding GET on the Data Engine Home URI. The POST SHALL include a non-empty body containing either a single JSON Atom Object or a JSON array containing one or more Atom Objects. The Content-Type of the message MUST be ‘application/json’.
The response returns HTTP status code 202 (Accepted) and an empty message body if the message format is accepted. One of the following HTTP status codes MUST be returned if an error occurs:
· 400 (Bad Request) if the message does not contain valid JSON or mandatory fields are missing from one or more of the atoms.
· 404 (Not Found) MAY indicate that the Atom POST URI might have changed and the client SHOULD obtain the URI from the Data Engine Home URI.
· 405 (Method Not Allowed) if another operation (e.g. GET/PUT/DELETE) is used
· 415 (Unsupported Media Type) if the content type is not ‘application/json’
· 500 (Internal Server Error) if an internal error occurred
If the message was not accepted the response message MAY contain a JSON object with a description of the error, i.e. a list of error messages.
If one or more of the Atoms in a request is missing mandatory elements then the response SHALL be 400 and none of the Atoms SHALL be accepted by the Data Engine. In this case, the sender MAY make a request to submit each atom individually in order that the well-formed ones can be accepted.
Method |
Request Content-Type |
Request Body |
Response Status |
Response Content-Type |
Response Body |
GET |
Any |
Any |
405 (Method not allowed) |
None |
None |
POST |
application/ json |
Valid JSON Atom |
202 (Accepted) |
None |
None |
POST |
application/ json |
Invalid JSON |
400 (Bad Request) |
application/ json |
None or JSON Object with a description of the error |
POST |
Any other |
|
415 (Unsupported Media Type) |
None |
None |
Example request message:
POST /atoms
Content-Type: application/json
Content-Length: nn
{ … }
Example response message:
HTTP/1.1 202 OK
Example request message with an incorrect
content type:
POST /atoms
Content-Type: image/png
Content-Length: 2134
{ … }
Example response message:
HTTP/1.1 415 Unsupported Media Type
Atom POST SHALL use anonymous TLS only. The Data Engine cannot authenticate the sender, since the Data Engine has no relationship with the consumer. Note that the ConsumerID or DeviceID MUST have been registered by an Operator for the Atom to be accepted.
The Data Engine MUST specify (e.g. through contract terms, on a web site, or as additional data in the Information Request response) how it will manage the following exceptional circumstances when receiving data:
· Duplicate Atom posts (e.g. over-write, return error, duplicate created)
· Atoms with invalid or missing ConsumerIDs and DeviceIDs
· Atoms with unallocated ConsumerIDs and DeviceIDs
· Atoms with missing essential fields
· Incorrectly formed Atoms
An atom object SHALL have the following format. The top level JSON SHALL be an object with the elements described below:
Name |
Value |
Description |
REQUIRED |
Version |
Integer |
Version of message format and COEL model |
Yes |
Context of the event:
Name |
Value |
Description |
REQUIRED |
Social |
Integer, 0-6 |
Indicates the social context of the activity |
No |
Weather |
Integer, 0-999 |
Indicates the general weather conditions at the time of the activity |
No |
ContextTag |
Integer |
Context provides the ability to encode “Why” information |
No |
ContextValue |
Integer |
Value of Context annotation. |
Yes if Context Tag present |
The enumeration values for Social SHALL be:
0: Don’t Know
1: Family
2: Colleagues
3: Guests
4: Partner
5: Myself
6: Friends
The enumeration values for Weather SHALL be those of the Open Weather Map weather condition code scheme [Weather].
There are no ContextTags defined in this version of the specification, but these MAY include references to previous Atoms to indicate causality or question / answer pairs to sequence interactions.
Time and duration of the event:
Name |
Value |
Description |
REQUIRED |
Time |
Integer |
Seconds since 1970/01/01 00:00Z (Unix timestamp in UTC) |
Yes |
UTCOffset |
Integer |
UTC Offset in seconds (e.g. UTC+1h = 3600, UTC-2h = -7200…) for the sender. |
No |
Accuracy |
Integer, 0-14 |
Indicates accuracy of the time field |
No |
Duration |
Integer |
Duration of the activity in seconds |
No |
The enumeration values for Accuracy SHALL be:
0: +/- 1 sec (exact)
1: +/- 1 min (default)
2: +/- 5 mins
3: +/- 15 mins
4: +/- 30 mins
5: +/- 1 hr
6: +/- 2 hrs
7: +/- 4 hrs
8: +/- 8 hrs
9: +/- 12 hrs
10: +/- 24 hrs (weekend)
11: +/- 72 hrs (week)
12: +/- 15 days (month)
13: +/- 91 days (season)
14: +/- 182 days (year)
This value refers to the accuracy reported and not necessarily the actual accuracy at which the measurement was obtained.
Atoms with duration of zero MAY be used and indicate and instantaneous event (or one where the duration is less than a second). A zero duration Atom MAY also be a marker for the end of a sequence of Atom such as in a running route, see section 3.6 Where.
Event as defined by the COEL model [COEL_COEL-1.0]:
Name |
Value |
Description |
REQUIRED |
Cluster |
Integer, 1-32 |
COEL cluster. |
Yes |
Class |
Integer, 1-99 |
COEL class, if available omit otherwise. |
Only when ‘Subclass’ is also used. |
SubClass |
Integer, 1-99 |
COEL subclass, if available omit otherwise. |
Only when ‘Element’ is also used. |
Element |
Integer, 1-99 |
COEL element, if available omit otherwise. |
No |
How the event was measured:
Name |
Value |
Description |
REQUIRED |
How |
Integer, 0-11 |
An enumerated value describing how the information was provided |
No |
Certainty |
Integer, 0-100 |
Percentage, certainty that this Atom is associated with the individual indicated in the Who field |
No |
Reliability |
Integer, 0-100 |
Percentage, reliability of this atom as a whole. The default SHALL be 50, with 100 only being used for correction atoms. |
No |
The enumeration values for How SHALL be:
0: Don't Know
1: Observed
2: Objectively Measured: Public Infrastructure
3: Objectively Measured: Private Infrastructure
4: Objectively Measured: Fixed Computing Device
5: Objectively Measured: Portable Computer
6: Objectively Measured: Phones and Pocket Device
7: Objectively Measured: Wearables
8: Objectively Measured: Implants
9: Self-Reported
10: Remembered
11: Computationally derived from other Atoms
Where the event occurred:
Name |
Value |
Description |
REQUIRED |
Exactness |
Integer, 0-14 |
Format and precision of where fields |
No |
Latitude |
Double |
GPS location |
No |
Longitude |
Double |
GPS location |
No |
MCC |
Integer |
Mobile country code |
No |
MNC |
Integer |
Mobile network code |
No |
LCA |
Integer |
Local Area Code |
No |
CID |
Integer |
Cell ID |
No |
Place |
Integer, 0-2 |
Profane location code |
No |
Postcode |
String |
Postcode |
No |
The enumeration values for Exactness SHALL be:
0: Mobile phone mast connected to the device.
1: Postcode or Zip code very long form.
2: Postcode or Zip code long form.
3: Postcode of Zip code short form
4: Place
5: GPS with accuracy between 0m and 1m.
6: GPS with accuracy between 1m and 5m.
7: GPS with accuracy between 5m and 10m.
8: GPS with accuracy between 10m and 15m.
9: GPS with accuracy between 15m and 20m.
10: GPS with accuracy between 20m and 25m.
11: GPS with accuracy between 25m and 30m.
12: GPS with accuracy between 30m and 50m.
13: GPS with accuracy between 50m and 100m.
14: GPS with accuracy between worse than 100m.
The enumeration values for Place SHALL be:
0: Home
1: Work
2: School
Where journeys are being recorded the location in this field SHALL be the starting location. The displacement of the journey can be recorded in an extension field and/or the final location MAY be recorded in a subsequent Atom.
Who the event relates to:
Name |
Value |
Description |
REQUIRED |
DeviceID
|
String |
Pseudonymous Key of the device that MUST be registered with a Consumer ID |
Yes if Consumer ID is not present |
ConsumerID
|
String |
Pseudonymous Key for the consumer, subject, user or patient. |
Yes if Device ID is not present |
The format of valid strings for ConsumerID and DeviceID are defined in [COEL_IDA-1.0].
Additional information about the event:
Name |
Value |
Description |
REQUIRED |
ExtIntTag |
Integer |
Extension tag for integer extension |
No |
ExtIntValue |
Integer |
Value of extension annotation |
Yes, if ExtIntTag present |
ExtFltTag |
Integer |
Extension tag for float extension |
No |
ExtFltValue |
Float |
Value of extension annotation |
Yes if ExtFltTag present |
ExtStrTag |
Integer |
Extension tag for string extension |
No |
ExtStrValue |
String |
Value of extension annotation |
Yes if ExtStrTag present |
Some proposed tags and values SHALL be (can be either integer or float depending on the precision available/needed):
1001 Resting heart rate bpm
1002 Average heart rate bpm
1003 Maximum heart rate bpm
1004 Blood pressure Encoded (SSSDDD)
1005 Weight kg
1006 Respiratory rate bpm
1007 Lung capacity cl
1008 Temperature C
1009 Oxygen saturation %
1010 Calories ingested kcal
1011 Calories burned kcal
1012 Steps taken count
1013 Distance km
1014 Climb m
1015 Body fat %
1016 Metabolic equivalent MET
1017 Water intake cl
The following is an example Behavioural Atom for the activity: ‘Housework’, ‘Dishes’, ‘Loading and unloading the dishwasher’, ‘Load the dishwasher’; the time is accurate to +/- 1 minute; it took place at a given postcode, it was reported by the user with a 100% certainty of the ‘Who’ field and a general ‘Reliability’ of 70%, the social context was with a partner.
{
“Header”:{“Version”:4},
“Who”:{“ConsumerID”:”5a702670-ff63-4d1d-ba9d-077dd345ab62”}
“What”:{“Cluster”:4,”Class”:4, “SubClass”:1,”Element”:4},
“When”:{“Accuracy”:1,”Time”:1423515660,”Duration”:437},
“Where”:{“Postcode”:”UB4 8FE”},
“How”:{“How”:9,”Certainty”:100,”Reliability”:70},
“Context”:{“Social”:4},
}
The following is an example Behavioural Atom for the activity: ‘Travel’, ‘Non Powered’, ‘Travelling by bicycle’, ‘Racing bike’; the time is exact; it started at the given latitude and longitude, it was reported by the user, and an application specific extension indicated that 26.2 km had been travelled.
{
“Header”:{“Version”:4},
“Who”:{“ConsumerID”:”5a702670-ff63-4d1d-ba9d-077dd345ab62”}
“What”:{“Cluster”:22,”Class”:1”SubClass”:1,”Element”:2},
“When”:{“Timezone”:”-01:00”,”Accuracy”:0,”Time”:1433397180,”Duration”:3903},
“Where”:{“Exactness”:6,”Latitude”:51.53118159161092,”Longitude”:-0.4319647327069491},
“How”:{“How”:9},
“Extension”:{“ExtFltTag”:1003,”ExtFltValue”:26.2},
}
A Data Engine interface for receiving Behavioural Atoms conforms if it meets the conditions set out in Section 2 of this document AND the conformance criteria in [COEL_RPE-1.0]
A Behavioural Atom is correctly formatted if it conforms to the conditions set out in Section 3.
The following individuals have participated in the creation of this specification and are gratefully acknowledged:
Participants:
Paul Bruton, Individual Member
Joss Langford, Activinsights
Matthew Reed, Coelition
David Snelling, Fujitsu
Revision |
Date |
Editor |
Changes Made |
1 |
22/9/2015 |
Joss Langford |
First full version |
2 |
25/9/2015 |
Joss Langford |
Correction of basic mistakes and omissions. |
3 |
13/10/2015 |
Paul Bruton |
Conformance includes reference to RPE document. |
4 |
19/10/2015 |
David Snelling |
Dealt with SHALL, MAY, and MUST and added examples. |
5 |
26/10/2015 |
David Snelling |
Minor updates to examples. |
6 |
31/10/2015 |
Joss Langford |
Accept all changes, track changes off, check references and style consistency. |
7 |
31/10/2015 |
Joss Langford |
Change history corrected. |
8 |
02/11/2015 |
David Snelling |
Final date change |
9 |
03/11/2015 |
Paul Bruton |
Typographic change following review. |
10 |
25/11/2015 |
Joss Langford |
Fix issue COEL-51: contingent requirements added to use of COEL layers in 3.4. |
11 |
25/11/2015 |
David Snelling |
Set date for CD publication |