http://docs.oasis-open.org/soa-eerp/issues/
SOA-EERP TC Issues List
Date: 2009/4/29
Revision: 3
spec
schema
example
all
interop
New
Active
Pending
Review
Deferred
Closed
Dropped
Should a complete bQoS example be included on the bQoS spec?
This issue was raised during the TC meeting on 4/15/2009. There are small
examples in sections for EERPPrice, EERPPerformance and EERPQuality, but
does not have an example for whole BQoS in the WD01. The whole bQoS example
can be found on the EERP Use Case and Example document.
EERP-bQoS
spec
editorial
Szu Chang
Szu Chang
spec example
New version of bQoS, Working draft 02, has been uploaded at http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-eerp/download.php/32306/BusinessQualityOfService-v1.0-spec-wd02.doc and it has the whole example for bQoS on new session 6.
Other quality indicators for bQoS
This issue was raised during the TC meeting on 4/15/2009 by James Zhang.
The current bQoS only has elements Price, time/Performance and name-value
pairs for Quality. Should other web services or software type of QoS
indicators be included for the bQoS spec, such as security, reliability,
etc.?
EERP-bQoS
spec
design
Szu Chang
Szu Chang
N/A
How to reference/use the Unit and Currency code
This issue was raised during the TC meeting on 4/15/2009 by Bill Cox and
Carol. In Use case and example, page 6, embedded - unitCode=each, for
example.
Bill: UnitCode from UBL. Currency code from there as well. Same as (or
derived from) UN-CEFACT. Concerned about pulling in too much of UBL for
just currency code and units. Also as much as the reference is interesting,
easier to resolve to the value "ea" for readability. End resolution is
easier to understand. Agree that supplying a URN is a valuable definition,
but simpler when one reads it to see the end result which would be "ea".
Carl: Same thing, but one is simpler and easier to read than the other.
Need to agree on what put in.
EERP-bQoS
spec
design
Szu Chang
Szu Chang
N/A
Name Space Names Not Intuitive
This issue was raised during the TC meeting on 4/15/2009 by Bill Cox. In
bQoS schema, it uses namespace like clm66411 and clm54217 which are not
intuitive.
EERP-bQoS
spec
editorial
Szu Chang
Szu Chang
N/A
Too many units in bQoS schema
This issue was raised during the TC meeting on 4/15/2009 by Bill Cox. In bQoS schema, it has too many units, perhaps, could use simpler model? Or IETF iCalendar (used in Buildings, Energy)?
EERP-bQoS
spec
design
Szu Chang
Szu Chang
N/A
New action holder
to be added
to be assigned