The table summarizes the comments that were received during the 15-day review of DITA 1.3 Errata 01 and their resolution. Comments came to both the dita-comment and DITA TC mailing lists.
A status of "Completed" in the Disposition column indicates that the editor has implemented the changes on which the TC decided, which are outlined in the Resolution column. It also is a hyperlink to the SVN commit notice on the DITA TC mailing list.
The item number is a hyperlink to the e-mail on the dita-comment or DITA TC mailing lists.
The following abbreviations are used:
| Item # | Date | Commenter | Description | Date acknowledged | Resolution | Disposition | Listed in errata document? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 June 2016 | RDA | Public identifiers for machinery task constraint and classification domain changed from DITA 1.2; | Not applicable | Correct error | Completed by RDA, 18 October 2016 | Yes |
| 2 | 7 June 2016 | RDA | Version-1.x public identifiers are missing from catalog | Not applicable | Defer to future release | Deferred | Not applicable |
| 3 | 17 August 2016 | Eric Sirois | Issue with short description for
<learningObjectMap> |
Not applicable | Correct error | Completed by KJE, 11 October 2016 | Yes |
| 4 | 08 October 2016 | KJE | Link to [xml:tm 1.0] is broken | Not applicable | Correct link | Completed by KJE, 08 October 2016 | No |
| 5 | 08 October 2016 | KJE | Link to the <dita> content model is broken in base
edition |
Not applicable | Correct link target; restore content as in 1.3 specification | Completed by RDA, 18 October 2016 | No |
| 6 | 08 October 2016 | KJE | Typo in 2.5.3.6 @class attribute rules and syntax |
Not applicable | Correct error | Completed by KJE, 08 October 2016 | Yes |
| 7 | 11 October 2016 | Rodolfo M. Raya | Public identifiers not in catalog | 17 October 2016 | Correct error in content of XML comment | Completed by RDA, 18 October 2016 | Yes |
| 8 | 11 October 2016 | Rodolfo M. Raya | Public identifiers not in catalog | 17 October 2016 | Correct error in content of XML comment | Completed by RDA, 18 October 2016 | Yes |